The result was speedy keep. The article as it stands now is vastly improved from the version at the time that Seraphimblade created the nomination. Congratulations on Yksin and others for a job well done. Placeholder account 03:27, 5 June 2007 (UTC) reply
Was speedy tagged under A7, but there is at least an assertion of notability, so it's not speedyable. Still, I see very little to indicate that we should have this article. Despite the voluminous number of "sources" presented, many of them do not mention the organization at all, and those which do simply name-drop it. One source is an in-depth essay regarding it but gives no idea who its author is or why it's reliable, and even presuming it did, it wouldn't be enough for an article, nor can I find anything more substantive to use. Seraphimblade Talk to me 03:54, 4 June 2007 (UTC) reply