- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. ( non-admin closure) SST flyer 02:56, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
- B. Shivadhar Reddy ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
promotional article for non notable police officer DGG ( talk ) 18:10, 26 August 2016 (UTC)
- Why do you consider the chief of police in a city with a population of over two million not to be notable? Would you say the same about a police chief in the same sized city in the USA, say, Houston? 86.17.222.157 ( talk) 20:48, 26 August 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple ( talk) 12:39, 28 August 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 07:29, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 07:29, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
- Delete per WP:PROMO. The subject does appear to be somewhat important figure, so I was not sure what my !vote should be. But I'm swayed by today's unsourced addition of "He is considered a no-nonsense officer that worshipped his service more than he did family." :-) This is strictly a vanity page, with no encyclopedic value. K.e.coffman ( talk) 05:39, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman ( talk) 05:39, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
- Keep. I would agree that the commissioner of police of a city with over 2 million inhabitants is notable. -- Necrothesp ( talk) 15:17, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp ( talk) 15:17, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — UY Scuti Talk 19:59, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — UY Scuti Talk 19:59, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
- Delete: Subject is
notable, but the tone used in article is totally unacceptable. Delete it for someone to start afresh. Open to change my !vote if tone is fixed and unsourced contents are purged.
Anup
[Talk] 19:42, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
- Irrelevant. We are discussing notability of the subject, not quality of the article. -- Necrothesp ( talk) 12:40, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
- Keep: Passes WP:GNG. The subject was awarded the president's medal which passes the first criteria of WP:ANYBIO. Ayub407 talk 06:30, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
- Delete instead as the only basis of the Keep votes is because of his career position, but in that and of itself, and examining this, has shown there's still no substance or otherwise convincing significance we can both improve and keep this sufficiently. SwisterTwister talk 07:22, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.