From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sarahj2107 ( talk) 17:58, 17 July 2018 (UTC) reply

AutoGravity (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A advertorially-toned page on an unremarkable private company. Significant RS coverage not found. What comes up is passing mentions, routine notices, and / or WP:SPIP, for example, this piece from forbes.com/sites which is a user submitted area: How Startup AutoGravity Is Doing For Auto Lending What Expedia Did For Travel.

Sources in the article are largely routine notices such as "AutoGravity launches national TV ads" and "VW Credit invests in AutoGravity". Other coverage details the company's hopes and aspirations, such as "Financial Technology Company Aims at Simplifying Financing Process", etc. Does not meet the new and improved WP:NCORP. Sourcing fails WP:CORPDEPTH; WP:TOOSOON per review of available sources. K.e.coffman ( talk) 02:16, 10 July 2018 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Everymorning talk to me 02:22, 10 July 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Hhkohh ( talk) 03:50, 10 July 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. North America 1000 14:30, 10 July 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. North America 1000 14:30, 10 July 2018 (UTC) reply
  • Delete. Most of the references are public relations submissions, and not sufficiently independent of the subject. I'm unable to find in depth coverage about AutoGravity from reliable sources. The four most comprehensive sources are listed under AutoGravity#Further reading: Finovate is not notable enough to have a Wikipedia page, Auto Remarketing didn't even bother to update their copyright footer from 2017, VentureBeat has a piece written by an AutoGravity employee, and HuffPost has a third-party contributor article. Newslinger ( talk) 21:28, 12 July 2018 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.