From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge‎ to List of .hack characters. plicit 14:45, 29 July 2023 (UTC) reply

Atoli (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Like Ovan, despite being sourced and well written. This article also mostly build up with trivia articles/sources like passing mentions from games reviews. It has zero WP:SIGCOV. GreenishPickle! ( 🔔) 14:42, 22 July 2023 (UTC) reply

Comment Only good source I could find is this but .hack is not that explored when compared to other RPGs in the West so I guess there is not much else to search. Tintor2 ( talk) 22:12, 22 July 2023 (UTC) reply

Impresive scraping of mentions in passing, but fails WP:SIGCOV. It would be a shame to loose this - I recommend SOFTDELETE and merger of reception to the List of .hack characters. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 02:29, 23 July 2023 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.