The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
A catalog-like entry on an unremarkable film series; significant RS coverage cannot be found. Does not meet
WP:NFILM, the awards listed (even if they were not PR driven) are not significant and well known. I am also nominating the following related pages because the articles follow the same format and have the same notability challenges:
Admin help comment Nominator asserts that all five of these articles have the "same notability challenges". Nominator has not prepared the discussion with the five WP:BEFORE D1 results, and four "Find sources" templates have not been provided. A quick count of references in the five articles indicates that those counts vary from 4 to 32. A review shows that the awards won by these five films varies.
Unscintillating (
talk)
03:59, 27 November 2016 (UTC)reply
This
request for help from administrators has been answered. If you need more help or have additional questions, please reapply the {{admin help}} template, or contact the responding user(s) directly on their own user talk page.
An editor has requested that the four extra articles added to this AfD be de-bundled. I have marked those four articles above with strikeout font. Please adjudicate the refusal of the nominator to de-bundle. Thank you,
Unscintillating (
talk)
03:59, 27 November 2016 (UTC)reply
Further admin help comment Although I stated in the above admin help that the four extra articles were marked with strikeout font, an editor just now removed those markings. However,
this diff now provides the same information. FYI,
Unscintillating (
talk)
04:43, 27 November 2016 (UTC)reply
Comment -- I don't see a problem with bundling this AfD, as I've nominated film series from a variety of production companies, and they all have the same format (brief blurb + list of awards) and are equally notability challenged. All have been deleted, including a series from
Girlfriends Films:
Mother-Daughter Exchange Club AfD.
Of course there is...there are brief descriptions of the films in question (including who directed them) & award/nomination sections...not to mention possibly some of the info that you intentionally, recently gutted from a couple of these articles before you brought them here to AfD.
Guy1890 (
talk)
10:36, 21 November 2016 (UTC)reply
Comment: Regarding the note that useful information has been removed from the articles prior to the nomination, here's the sample from Lesbian Seductions, Dec 2015 page version:
Comment - Just to clear here about what's really happened to some of the articles nominated at this AfD (in addition to many, many, many more articles that have been edited in recent weeks/months by the same editor that started this AfD), they recently
gutted more than 85% of one of the articles, including removing info that was reliably-sourced (just like is highlighted above). Both
IMDb &
IAFD are reliable sources for release dates, running times, and/or cast lists for these kind of movies.
Guy1890 (
talk)
06:28, 28 November 2016 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.