- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 01:02, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
Armaan Jaffer
- Armaan Jaffer ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Article's subject fails WP:NCRIC and therefore the WP:GNG. Longstanding consensus at WP:CRIC that under-19 international cricketers are not inherently notable. GreenCricket TALK 10:32, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Nordic Dragon 10:43, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Cricket-related deletion discussions. Nordic Dragon 10:43, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Nordic Dragon 10:43, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
- Keep failing WP:NCRIC does not automatically mean a player fails WP:GNG. The Google hits for his junior achievements more than meet the GNG on their own, rendering the sport-specific criteria obsolete. Harrias talk 10:34, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
- Keep Totally endorse the above. Jaffer clearly meets WP:GNG AusLondonder ( talk) 22:20, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
- Keep Per above, clearly passes WP:GNG. Joseph2302 ( talk) 21:43, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.