The result was keep. This has been withdrawn but if serious imporvements don't happen quickly I predict another discussion Spartaz Humbug! 05:52, 8 July 2010 (UTC) reply
This article is a thinly-veiled attempt to push a particular POV. For example, it claims that criticizing "ethnocentric elements within the white commmunity" is a form of "anti-white" racism. It's worth pointing out that the article's author, Wittsun, uses "ethnocentric" as a euphemism for things like this; see his comments on this talk page. The article sites 3 specific events and uses them to establish a general trend of "anti-white policies"? Obvously a major stretch; in short, this is an essay, not an article. Stonemason89 ( talk) 17:56, 30 June 2010 (UTC) reply
Similarly, if you want to break out racism in the United States#Anti-White crimes then in fact the subject, as discussed in sources, is hate crimes against white people. There's a fair amount to discuss, from U.S. law enforcement surveys, through questions that people have raised of whether enforcement is even, and through whether it constitutes racism (which, unsurprisingly, people differ upon), to the notion put forward by some people that there's no such thing at all.
I suggest that your solution here is to take out the reverse discrimination parts of this article (and focus your efforts there for writing about that subject) leaving the crimes, to rename this article from its non-subject title to hate crimes against white people, to refactor, and to start putting in some analysis and explanation instead of just growing a laundry list that is largely uninformative to readers (and will only — I speak from long experience. — result in an AFD re-nomination a year from now). Uncle G ( talk) 22:35, 30 June 2010 (UTC) reply