From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 17:33, 26 May 2019 (UTC) reply

Ann Mallek

Ann Mallek (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NPOL as a member of a council for a county of about 100,000 people. All sources are either routine local coverage or from primary sources such as town and campaign websites. GPL93 ( talk) 17:09, 19 May 2019 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Virginia-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 17:13, 19 May 2019 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 17:13, 19 May 2019 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 17:13, 19 May 2019 (UTC) reply
  • Delete county board members are almost never notable, no reason to view Mallek as an exception. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 21:35, 19 May 2019 (UTC) reply
  • Delete Per nom. -- qedk ( t c) 05:51, 20 May 2019 (UTC) reply
  • Delete though i'm usually not a deletionist, this is a non-notable living person whose ~only~ claim to fame is lucking into an unopposed local party political ticket. other life items like marrying a dentist and being from an old family just don't qualify. WP doesn't need to be a re-election ad for every middling county supervisors member in the US. Cramyourspam ( talk) 22:39, 20 May 2019 (UTC) reply
  • Delete. County council is not a level of office that guarantees a Wikipedia article per WP:NPOL, but this is not referenced to anything like the depth or range of reliable source coverage it would take to get her over the bar as a special case. Bearcat ( talk) 17:13, 22 May 2019 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.