The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Fails general notability criteria. Contested prod; marked as of questionable notability since Aug 2015. Only 2 of the citations given are independent reliable sources about the person and both are about a failed candidacy, so fails
WP:NPOL.
Bondegezou (
talk) 08:44, 27 June 2016 (UTC)reply
Delte His only potential notability is as a politician but he is not notable as such.
John Pack Lambert (
talk) 01:01, 28 June 2016 (UTC)reply
Delete - seems to be a run-of-the-mill medical researcher and unsuccessful politician. I'm not seeing the independent coverage sufficient to pass
WP:BIO; routine articles covering election candidates aren't enough.
Robofish (
talk) 00:11, 1 July 2016 (UTC)reply
Keep. Politics aside, appears to have made a number of contributions and leads a research group at SGUL
[1]. Won a prize in 2011.
JFW |
T@lk 11:55, 1 July 2016 (UTC)reply
Keep. While his political and business activities certainly don't seem notable, GScholar seems to produce two papers with over 2,000 citations each and an
h-index of just below 50 - in fact, he seems significantly important as an early researcher on HIV. Even in a high-citation field like medicine, this looks adequate to satisfy
WP:PROF#1.
PWilkinson (
talk) 10:47, 2 July 2016 (UTC)reply
Comment just on one point there:
WP:PROF warns against using h-index.
Bondegezou (
talk) 11:44, 2 July 2016 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —
Coffee //
have a cup //
beans // 01:31, 5 July 2016 (UTC)reply
Keep as 1,6000 WorldCat listings is enough.
SwisterTwistertalk 23:03, 12 July 2016 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.