- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 22:04, 22 May 2017 (UTC)
- Ang Panday (2017 film) ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
WP:NFF made it clear that articles about films should not be created until principal photography has begun as supported by reliable source; not the case with this one. Blue sphere 13:58, 8 May 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Lepricavark ( talk) 17:32, 8 May 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. Lepricavark ( talk) 17:32, 8 May 2017 (UTC)
- Delete Plain and simple WP:TOOSOON, as mentioned by nominator. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 18:26, 15 May 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 18:29, 15 May 2017 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 18:29, 15 May 2017 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Can be re-created if/when it's released or selected for the film festival in question. The article is just a gossip piece as it stands. Lugnuts Fire Walk with Me 19:47, 15 May 2017 (UTC)
- Delete for now per above -- Lenticel ( talk) 00:31, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.