The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Nomination withdrawn. ( non-admin closure) Winged Blades ^Godric 04:25, 24 February 2017 (UTC) reply

Andrey Artemenko (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:POLITICIAN.Article reads like a promo cum PR piece. Winged Blades ^Godric 17:09, 21 February 2017 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 17:24, 21 February 2017 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ukraine-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 17:24, 21 February 2017 (UTC) reply

• Comment. As a former People's Deputy of Ukraine (a member of parliament), the subject passes WP:POLITICIAN. That and the current controversy involving him can easily be verified. [1] • Gene93k ( talk) 17:27, 21 February 2017 (UTC) reply
• Comment. Self-written PR garbage full of unverified stuff. No sources, lots of irrelevant anecdotes, uninformative and should be deleted as the subject wrote it himself. noclador ( talk) 21:56, 21 February 2017 (UTC) reply
• Keep Per WP:NPOL #1 "Politicians and judges who have held international, national or sub-national (statewide/provincewide) office, and members or former members of a national, state or provincial legislature". WP:AFDISNOTCLEANUP. AusLondonder ( talk) 22:11, 21 February 2017 (UTC) reply
• Keep - notable politician, plenty of english language press about him out now too --BLACK FUTURE ( tlk2meh) 22:31, 21 February 2017 (UTC) reply
• Keep articles for deletion is not for cleanup. Being a member of a national legislature always makes someone notable. If the article is poorly written, then edit it and improve it, the subject is without question notable. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 01:46, 22 February 2017 (UTC) reply
• Keep and clean up. He is notable, but contents of the article must fulfill WP:V, WP:NPOV and WP:NOR, particularly under WP:BLP. Jack N. Stock ( talk) 02:17, 22 February 2017 (UTC) reply
• Keep. Clearly does pass WP:POLITICIAN. -- Necrothesp ( talk) 14:38, 22 February 2017 (UTC) reply
• Keep. Passes WP:NPOL as a serving member of a national legislature. Article is definitely in dire need of improvement, but that's what the maintenance queues are for. Bearcat ( talk) 18:53, 22 February 2017 (UTC) reply
• Keep clearly notable. Clean it up, don't delete it. Lepricavark ( talk) 14:30, 23 February 2017 (UTC) reply
• Keep Passes WP:POLITICIAN. The article needs improvements, though.-- Asqueladd ( talk) 01:42, 24 February 2017 (UTC) reply
• SNOW keep Member of the Ukrainian parliament so meets WP:POLITICIAN and the Trump stuff ensures ongoing coverage. –  Muboshgu ( talk) 02:38, 24 February 2017 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.