The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. → Call me Hahc 21 16:29, 4 December 2014 (UTC) reply

Amrita Rai (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The subject is not notable. The subject is a TV news anchor but was in news herself when some photographs of her with a prominent politician were made public. The page has no scope for further development as like thousands of professionals, she too is a professional and her relationship with a prominent politician cannot be used to assert the notability. Moreover, it is quite clear from the content of the page that as of now also, the page has nothing to say except her relationship with the politician. Katyaan ( talk) 06:21, 27 November 2014 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Randykitty ( talk) 11:19, 27 November 2014 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Randykitty ( talk) 11:19, 27 November 2014 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Randykitty ( talk) 11:19, 27 November 2014 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Randykitty ( talk) 11:20, 27 November 2014 (UTC) reply

• Delete She might be notable enough for a one-sentance mention in the Singh article, but there is no reason to have a stand alone article on her. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 14:34, 27 November 2014 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 15:10, 27 November 2014 (UTC) reply

• Delete Currently looks like a clear wp:BLP1E issue to me. Neonchameleon ( talk) 17:02, 28 November 2014 (UTC) reply
• Delete - if you remove the unsourced gossip and slut shaming, there's not much left. Bearian ( talk) 00:59, 2 December 2014 (UTC) reply
• Delete Non-notable. No need for separate article a byline in the politician's article is the most coverage it should get with RS. WP:NOTSCANDAL applies here. Article written based on gossip and "scandal" of a person's personal life. Cowlibob ( talk) 21:23, 2 December 2014 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.