The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Due to the limited amount of discussion this got, even after two relists, I'm going to call this a
WP:SOFTDELETE --
RoySmith(talk) 21:14, 11 December 2016 (UTC)reply
Does not appear to meet
WP:GNG on its own. Anything useful to say about this could probably be said in the
American Board of Dental Specialties article (if that article is notable enough for inclusion...).
Sjrct (
talk) 02:54, 18 November 2016 (UTC)reply
Delete - agree with nominator that it fails notability criteria at this point in time.
Sagecandor (
talk) 02:41, 22 November 2016 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, → Call meRazrNation 10:32, 26 November 2016 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 07:37, 3 December 2016 (UTC)reply
Comment There appears to be a slow-moving legal and policy debate about whether dental specialties outside the control of the American Dental Association are valid. See, for example, this Google new search
"American+Dental+Board+of+Anesthesiology"&tbm=nws. Would merging this and the
American Board of Dental Specialties articles into a new article on "Dental Specialties Controversy" or similar not be a better option?
Eggishorn(talk)(contrib) 17:23, 5 December 2016 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.