The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Part of an apparent promotional campaign. The claim of 52 publications sounded impressive, until I actually looked. She has written one book, co-chaired one conference, and written a dozen of so technical reports mostly for the
Center for Global Development , (itself the subject of an exceptionally spammy and congratulatory article which will need to be looked at. )These reports are typically found in only two or three libraries, and are usually under 100 pages. I listed a few of them. The other publication are magazine articles.
The other references are either her own works, her own organization's work, or her own blurbs for various conferences and organization, DGG (
talk )
08:47, 25 March 2017 (UTC)reply
But she is not an academic. Her notability, such as it is , is as an organizer. Public health is not a low cited field. Anyway, it's not h index that matters but the distribution of citation h=17 can mean 17 items with 17 citations each, or 1item with 500 and 16 items with 16 each. Here, she has no item with over 100 citations, and in biomedical sciences, that's the effective minimum standard. DGG (
talk )
00:38, 28 March 2017 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.