The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
DeleteRedirect to
Alpha Centauri. As I mentioned in the last discussion, the researchers themselves are unsure if the planet exists, and until someone verifies its existence (which as far as I can tell has not happened) it is a hypothetical body of little significance.
Primefac (
talk)
01:43, 21 April 2016 (UTC)reply
Technically there is nothing to merge (the paragraphs are pretty much identical between the articles), so would a redir be an acceptable option? (as a note, I've changed my !vote above).
Primefac (
talk)
14:49, 21 April 2016 (UTC)reply
*Keep, Alpha Centauri Bb is notable and has received exquisite media attention, In fact the latest news attention it received was on April 14th 2016,
(click here). This planet, although a false detection has received a huge amount of media attention (search Alpha Centauri Bb on Google News) and therefore passes Wikipedias Notability Guidelines (
WP:GNG). Davidbuddy9 Talk 23:07, 21 April 2016 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.