The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
An eSports player with no real assertion to notability beyond niche interests. Fails
WP:GNG. Notably, unlike some eSports subjects on Wikipedia, he hasn't even won anything - and just appears to be a typical run-of-the-mill professional player. Also a lack of reliable sources, as much of it is eSports specific sites and The Daily Dot, which is disputed as an appropriate source for asserting notability.
KaisaL (
talk)
14:15, 4 July 2016 (UTC)reply
Comment. He certainly does not fail WP:GNG as he was on the cover of Urheilulehti a few months ago, and there are plenty of articles about him in Finland's largest circulation newspapers.
[1][2][3]Prolog (
talk)
08:11, 5 July 2016 (UTC)reply
@
Prolog: Is there evidence of him being on the cover? If there is then I would be happy to agree with youchanged to weak delete instead, this is exactly the sort of coverage we need.
KaisaL (
talk)
11:59, 5 July 2016 (UTC)reply
I think I am going to change to weak delete - but still a delete - if that's ok. I'm not convinced there's enough beyond that, and while being on the cover of that magazine is certainly an achievement, it's a single example from an albeit long-established magazine with a circulation of
31,000 as of 2014 and only about
6,000 followers on Twitter. (I appreciate the latter of this is not a reliable metric in itself, but it says to me that this isn't the major magazine it may have initially seemed to be.) But at the same time it's a better source than most eSports content is throwing up. Yet as
Ravenswing says below, we're dealing in casual mentions the rest of the time. So lots of flip sides but overall I'd say not quite enough.
KaisaL (
talk)
01:02, 6 July 2016 (UTC)reply
Urheilulehti was the most read sports magazine in Finland in 2014.
[4] I don't know how many subscribers you expect for a non-general magazine written in a language spoken by about five million people, and published in the country with the heaviest library use per capita. I also don't understand how anyone can call
this 1000-word article on the subject published by Helsingin Sanomat a "casual mention".
Prolog (
talk)
07:09, 6 July 2016 (UTC)reply
I can indeed confirm users have applied their favourite guidelines, whether relevant or not, in AFDs for at least a decade. That doesn't mean such application needs to carry much weight, particularly if more established concerns are satisfied. Regardless, you should explain what is "routine" about an esports player being the cover story in a 118-year-old sports magazine.
Prolog (
talk)
21:42, 5 July 2016 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.