The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
This is an article on the INTERIM county attorney for a county in Arizona. All the references in the article, and everything outside it, cover her only in this capacity and seem to be routine.
Wolfson5 (
talk)
21:16, 12 January 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete. County attorneys are not inherently notable in the absence of sufficient
reliable source coverage to demonstrate that they're much more notable than the norm for that level of prominence — such as either nationalizing coverage that expands far beyond just where it's merely expected to exist, or a depth of coverage that plainly goes deeper than the norm and contextualizes her importance. The sources here don't do that, however, but just redundantly (and locally) offer verification and reverification that she exists, which is not enough in and of itself.
Bearcat (
talk)
16:41, 13 January 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete, as coverage seems not to be about her. As concerns
WP:POLITICIAN, however, given the position is a very local and appointed one, I don't even think anyone could possibly be considered inherently notable under the criteria. GNG she fails. Best,
PK650 (
talk)
22:39, 16 January 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.