The result was delete. JohnCD ( talk) 19:49, 25 March 2012 (UTC) reply
A WP:BLP entirely unsourced, except for the individual's existence. It fails both WP:GNG and WP:BIO. I have found no significant coverage in any sources. The references provided -- a self-submitted YouTube clip, an unidentified photo, a mention of a classroom talk local to a college, etc. -- do not meet reliability standards. — CactusWriter (talk) 22:18, 16 March 2012 (UTC) reply
Ali Dia's page is well sourced and is accurate. I am unsure as to why cactus is so adamant. It may be sensorship because Ali Dia is such an outspoken critic of Bashar Assad. Maybe Cactus is pro-Bashar? Im completely against Wikipedia censoring someome based on their political views. Would be sad if such an informative and accurate portrayal of Ali Dia would be removed. The following are links which support the accuracy of what is stated:
https://www.facebook.com/events/122362341210634/
https://www.facebook.com/events/367078286641635/?ref=nf
https://www.facebook.com/events/246384535417202/
http://plancast.com/p/8l4s/syria-contextualizing-revolution
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YBeesQJDvt4
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xw55dK9C_Zw — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.74.71.19 ( talk) 02:32, 23 March 2012 (UTC) reply