The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 22:43, 20 March 2006 (UTC) reply
Not listed on the IMDB. Very unpromising Google results. [1] Article says she appeared on two shows, but those credits would've been on the IMDB if true.
Second2. "Very Unpromising Google results" has nothing to do with the validity of the actress in question. Having peoples opinions written about you on websites has no validity if you were or were not appearing on a television show. I can say Ashton Kutcher is the worst actor in the world, it doesn't mean he hasn't been on tv.
Third 3. "A 10-year-old extra does not qualify as notable." So I guess Dakota Fanning shouldnt be on here either right?
Fourth 4. "Family is already notorious for self-promotion in theater/TV community. " Unless you know the family personally, or are their agent, then you really don't know, and you base your opinion on other people's opinions.
The point of Wikki is to list FACTS, not OPINIONS. If you cannot PROOVE she has NOT been on television then you cannot say that she hasn't, opinions matter little.
I actually am a CD that found this link typing her name into a search engine. She will be appearing with Alyssa Milano in a Humane Society Commercial in June. I know for a FACT because I am the one that cast her.
Vanity that.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.184.17.216 ( talk • contribs)
JackO'Lantern , this may come as a surprise, but Dakata Fanning was in 6 independant movies before she "hit it big" AND 2 commercials ! (Do you think they just pulled her out of daycare?)
I suggest you go see the website in question, you'll see a girl in a picture with THE casting director for Palmetto Pointe, PRACTICING LINES.
The FACT is, she HAS been on TV, she HAS been in independant movies, she WILL be in more commercials.
The opinion (Yours) is, She's not good enough to list on Wikki because you don't think her being 10 years old and being in commercials counts as being on tv.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Justadding ( talk • contribs)
"It's standard practice to delete an entry if we can't establish notability (or in this case, the existence of the subject)."
That's a damn realistic mannequin that they're using. It looks just like a little girl. My guess is the cameras are fake too. /end sarcasm — Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.184.17.216 ( talk • contribs)
Delete per funky monkey -- pm_shef 01:39, 16 March 2006 (UTC) reply
I was what? Don't change shit around on this page to make it look like I'm saying stuff I'm not. That's just plain bullshit.