From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Yunshui  09:15, 13 June 2018 (UTC) reply

Alexander B. Gray (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Random no-name politico from DC. Google shows no substantial coverage, and while it is wonderfully ref-bombed, none of it is substantial, intellectually independent, or reliable. We're talking about one-line quotes and his own articles, nothing more. Nothing here meets NPOL as he is not an elected official, and he fails WP:N. TonyBallioni ( talk) 21:59, 29 May 2018 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. cinco de L3X1 ◊distænt write◊ 23:40, 29 May 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. cinco de L3X1 ◊distænt write◊ 23:40, 29 May 2018 (UTC) reply
  • It does seem a bit too soon. I'm not seeing susbtantial coverage. FloridaArmy ( talk) 23:49, 29 May 2018 (UTC) reply
  • Delete way below the threshold for administration figure notability unless there is enough coverage to pass GNG which there is not. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 00:06, 31 May 2018 (UTC) reply
  • Delete Fails WP:POLITICIAN. Doesn't really tell us anything that says he is above general office staff, and nothing comes up on an internet search. To be blunt, in the current White House climate, the nightly news details a virtual revolving door of staffers who are here today and gone tomorrow. No sourcing here to say this individual has notability. — Maile ( talk) 00:30, 9 June 2018 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle ( talk) 01:26, 6 June 2018 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.