The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedied G4 (recreation of previously deleted content).
Bearcat (
talk) 15:47, 20 March 2016 (UTC)reply
This is written like a
résumé, almost entirely in bullet point form, rather than like an encyclopedia article. It makes no substantive claim of
notability under any of our inclusion standards for any of his endeavours — even as a "politician", he's just asserted as a PR spokesman for his party rather than an elected or appointed holder of any notable political office. And of the sources that have been shown, all three of them are about things that he's claimed to have been associated with, while failing to actually contain even one single mention of his name by which we could possibly
verify his claimed involvement in them — so
WP:GNG has not been passed either. Delete, without prejudice against recreation in the future if and when his notability and/or sourceability improve.
Bearcat (
talk) 17:20, 18 March 2016 (UTC)reply
Yep, I just checked the deleted edits and it is indeed the same person — in fact, it's full-on the same text. Thanks for the catch, I'm speedying this as a recreation of deleted content accordingly.
Bearcat (
talk) 15:47, 20 March 2016 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.