The result was Delete Ackerman, No Conesnsus on other politicians. The discussion on the other two folks is mixed, and some opinions are ambiguous respect to them; no prejudice against renomination of them individually. j⚛e decker talk 16:51, 29 January 2013 (UTC) reply
Minor local policitian that fails
WP:POLITICIAN. Most coverage I saw was either obligatory campaign coverage or
WP:Run-of-the-mill coverage of office duties. He may become notable some day, but not yet.
I am also nominating the following related pages as similarly non-notable local policiticans that fail WP:POLITICIAN and have little coverage aside from obligatory campaign coverage and run of the mill coverage of duties etc. Note that "mayor" is a committeeman selected by their peers, not as an actual election. The position is a pro tem type position.:
Niteshift36 ( talk) 16:11, 14 January 2013 (UTC) reply
Comment The mayor of a municipality, regardless how selected, is the chief elected official of that entity, its "head of state" if you will, and its legal and symbolic spokesperson. I do not know anything about the specific New Jersey municipality under discussion here, but I would expect that the mayor of any city of significant size is almost certainly notable. Kestenbaum ( talk) 21:10, 15 January 2013 (UTC) reply
Correction It isn't a pro-tem-type mayor, but a chairman-type. This type of mayor is exceedingly common in the United States, btw. – Philosopher Let us reason together. 21:34, 15 January 2013 (UTC) reply