The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Delete. You're correct that serving on a political party's internal organizational board is not an
WP:NPOL pass in its own right — it's a thing that could still theoretically (but usually doesn't) get a person enough
reliable source coverage to be kept on pure
WP:GNG grounds, but not an automatic notability freebie that entitles a person to have a Wikipedia article in and of itself. But the references here are one
primary source and one glancing namecheck of his existence as a giver of soundbite in an article whose subject is somebody else, which is not how you get a person over GNG.
Bearcat (
talk)
15:57, 24 June 2018 (UTC)reply
Delete per nomination. Subject could, of course, have been independably notable himself, but all we have in
sources is that he's the chair of a party that won 0.3% of the vote in the 2017 general election. I wonder who the table is. -
The Gnome (
talk)
09:22, 30 June 2018 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.