The result of the debate was BJAODN. Mailer Diablo 02:03, 13 May 2006 (UTC) reply
I listed this page for proposal but the author disputed it. I believe that the article, which claims to describe an obscure act of sexual deviance, is non-notable and unverifiable. It's also possible that the article is a joke. See the discussion page for more details. D. Wu 22:31, 7 May 2006 (UTC) reply