From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 19:16, 18 November 2017 (UTC) reply

Al Lockwood (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

BLP of a failed parliamentary candidate. Had brief notability as a candidate against the sitting Prime Minister at the time. Does not meet NPOL. Cowlibob ( talk) 21:40, 11 November 2017 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 22:51, 11 November 2017 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 22:51, 11 November 2017 (UTC) reply
  • Delete failed candidates for parliament are not notable for such. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 05:26, 12 November 2017 (UTC) reply
  • Comment Coverage from 2005 [1] I see later coverage as he was appointed as the independent expenses compliance officer- [2] [3] [4] though apparently only interim. Galobtter ( talk) 14:30, 12 November 2017 (UTC) reply
  • Delete. Unsuccessful candidates for political office do not get Wikipedia articles just for being candidates, being a competing candidate in the Prime Minister's constituency isn't a free notability boost, and campaign-related coverage doesn't get them over WP:GNG by itself because every candidate for anything could always show some — to consider his candidacy a special case because media coverage, we would have to see some proof that he got significantly more media coverage than most candidates could routinely expect to receive. The only potential notability here is his apparent stint as the expenses compliance officer — but even then, I'd still need to see more substance and sourcing about his work in that role than just a couple of media hits announcing his initial appointment. Bearcat ( talk) 22:14, 12 November 2017 (UTC) reply
  • Delete Fails GNG/NPOL. South Nashua ( talk) 11:21, 13 November 2017 (UTC) reply
  • Delete - Fails GNG and the high bar SNG for politicians. Unelected politician, in other words. Carrite ( talk) 02:51, 17 November 2017 (UTC) reply
  • Delete WP:TOOSOON, at best! -- Mhhossein talk 13:02, 18 November 2017 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.