The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 06:47, 1 November 2016 (UTC) reply

Ahmed Kadhem al-Rawi (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Per request from OTRS 2016092810006075 motivated by a belief that the allegation of association with an organization associated with terrorism creates a potential safety issue for the subject and family S Philbrick (Talk) 11:53, 24 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 18:48, 24 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Islam-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 18:48, 24 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 18:48, 24 October 2016 (UTC) reply

• Delete article that lacks sources to establish claims. Especially these types of claims should not be left intact on a living person when we lack sources. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 21:46, 24 October 2016 (UTC) reply
• Delete. An allegation of association with a terrorist organization is not, in and of itself, a basis for a standalone WP:BLP — but that's really the only notability claim being made here at all. We have a rule on here that we have to be especially vigilant about information that could be libellous if proven false — and if you took every sentence out of the article that's fundamentally about tying him to the Muslim Brotherhood, you'd literally have nothing left except "this is a person who exists, the end". Bearcat ( talk) 15:19, 26 October 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.