The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Keep meets
WP:NCRIC. Ten days ago,
I reminded this editor about the
closing comments of a past RfC "As with the RfC on secondary school notability, this should not be an invitation to "flood AfD with indiscriminate or excessive nominations". This is one of approx. a dozen back-to-back nominations made today within a 30 minute window, suggesting no attempt at
WP:BEFORE was used pre-nomination. LugnutsFire Walk with Me13:55, 18 January 2021 (UTC)reply
Delete. Subject trivially passes NCRIC, which by consensus only provides a very weak presumption of notability that is unreliable for cricketers such as these (
recent NSPORT discussion here), but absolutely fails all meaningful guidelines including GNG and SPORTCRIT. No sources beyond wide ranging databases; no suitable list to merge into. wjematherplease leave a message...12:33, 22 January 2021 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.