The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Nomination withdrawn --
intgr[talk] 11:36, 1 March 2016 (UTC)reply
Comment: @
Prof tpms: Coverage in multiple independent reliable sources is sufficient for notability per
WP:GNG criteria, and 3 news articles are cited in the article. If you believe these are not sufficient, please be less terse and state your reasons in the nomination. --
intgr[talk] 10:25, 29 February 2016 (UTC)reply
Comment: @
Intgr: This gentleman belongs to a political party called
AIMIM which itself is not notable with only one lone seat in the Indian Parliament. --
Prof TPMS (
talk) 10:30, 29 February 2016 (UTC)reply
@
Prof tpms: If you put it like that, then I'm afraid you don't understand the
general notabiliy guideline. How notable this person's party is, or how many seats it has in a parlament, does not matter to notability (
WP:NOTINHERIT). What matters is the number and quality of sources about the article's subject. --
intgr[talk] 11:23, 29 February 2016 (UTC)reply
Keep: Notable, satisfies
WP:GNG. While there isn't much content in the article, there are many English-language sources available about this person (linked in the article), and probably lots more in Hindi. Based on the English-language sources alone, I think it satisfies the GNG. --
intgr[talk] 13:50, 29 February 2016 (UTC)reply
Keep: The subject passes
WP:POLITICIAN criterion 1 by being a multiply-elected MLA. (The article title should be standardised after the conclusion of the AfD.)
AllyD (
talk) 14:10, 29 February 2016 (UTC)reply
Keep, easily satisfied
WP:POLITICIAN has he was elected MLA. --
Soman (
talk) 18:44, 29 February 2016 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.