The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. No prejudice against speedy renomination per low participation. North America ¹⁰⁰⁰ 12:17, 25 February 2019 (UTC) reply

Advocate Anis Ahmed Khan (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject does not appear to meet relevant notability guidelines and lacks non-trivial coverage from independent reliable sources. Steps were taken to locate sources WP:BEFORE this nomination, but were not successful. Saqib ( talk) 11:56, 4 February 2019 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU ^(T) 17:39, 4 February 2019 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU ^(T) 17:39, 4 February 2019 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. ― Matthew J. Long -Talk- ^☖ 04:30, 15 February 2019 (UTC) reply

• Keep. Passes WP:GNG. Subject covered in Pakistan Today, The Express Tribune, and The News International. I would say that this should be expanded rather than deleted. ― Matthew J. Long -Talk- ^☖ 04:35, 15 February 2019 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.