The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Keep I agree that the content in this article is poor, and that the current content does overlap in scope with
Online advertising. There is another problem: this article is currently titled "advertising revenue", when it should be moved to "online advertising revenue" because all the content is about online advertising, and not advertising revenue from television, print media, or other non-Internet forms of advertising.
We still should keep because if we combined the text we hit 49k of readable prose, which per
WP:TOOBIG is near 50k the point of splitting with length as a rationale. Also despite overlapping in scope, this is a tidy article which does not actually overlap in content with "online advertising". I think it is fine to have an article which stands alone and presents just this facet of online advertising, including by listing the major platforms as it does. Remedies: rename, and link to this article from "online advertising" with a section heading and {{main subject|Advertising revenue}}.
Bluerasberry (talk)18:58, 22 August 2022 (UTC)reply
Keep. This is a distinct topic and not a fork. It is a revenue slice, like merchandising. However, there is overlap with
Online advertising that should be removed, and a clear focus on the income aspect should be made.
SWinxy (
talk)
04:00, 1 September 2022 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.