The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 05:51, 20 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Adolph R. Bucknam (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete. Biography, based entirely on directory sources with no evidence of reliable source coverage shown at all, of a person whose only claim of notability is as a non-winning candidate for political office. As always, this is not a claim of notability that gets a person into Wikipedia if the sourcing is this weak. Bearcat ( talk) 21:24, 12 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Bearcat ( talk) 21:27, 12 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wisconsin-related deletion discussions. North America ¹⁰⁰⁰ 23:56, 12 October 2016 (UTC) reply

• Delete: fails WP:POLITICIAN. Safehaven86 ( talk) 21:15, 13 October 2016 (UTC) reply
• Delete Even being a major party candidate would probably not put him to notable status in any of these races, being a 3rd party candidate clearly does not. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 00:19, 14 October 2016 (UTC) reply
• Delete. I'll put my vote in, but I can't add anything to what has already been said. Dolotta ( talk) 02:00, 14 October 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.