The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Whereas the article was considerably improved during the nomination, I still see no consensus w/r notability. Defaulted to keep.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 08:28, 20 September 2014 (UTC) reply

Adi Agom Kebang

Adi Agom Kebang (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable, unreferenced. Cheers, Thanks, L235- Talk Ping when replying 03:17, 13 September 2014 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. Jinkinson talk to me 03:21, 13 September 2014 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. — Ascii002 Talk Contribs GuestBook 03:41, 13 September 2014 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. — Ascii002 Talk Contribs GuestBook 03:41, 13 September 2014 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. — Ascii002 Talk Contribs GuestBook 03:42, 13 September 2014 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. — Ascii002 Talk Contribs GuestBook 03:44, 13 September 2014 (UTC) reply

• Keep The article was not unreferenced, but rather the one reference was poorly formatted. I fixed that. A simple Google search shows that this website/organization has played a critical role in recent years in revitalizing the language and literature of the Adi and Mising language speaking tribal groups of northeastern India. Sources are ample and readily available. I have expanded the article and added several more sources. Any diligent editor can do much more, as I do not have the time today to read detailed sources such as a readily available article from the International Journal of Advanced Research in Computer Sciences and Software Engineering, which credits the work of this website in advancing automated speech recognition in the Adi language. Clearly notable. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 06:07, 13 September 2014 (UTC) reply
• Delete - Clear case of WP:COI, generally logo/seals of companies is not owned by editors where the contributor of this article claiming to be the copyright holder of the logo used in the article. For me there is no indication of importance. — CutestPenguin ^Hangout 13:03, 13 September 2014 (UTC) reply
• Keep, most educational and noteworthy. — Cirt ( talk) 03:05, 17 September 2014 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.