The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. MBisanztalk 02:03, 26 June 2016 (UTC)reply
With lack of significant coverage in reliable sources, the person doesn't seem to have done/achieved much that could be worth writing about. Fails
WP:GNG and
WP:AUTHOR. Yash! 15:43, 18 June 2016 (UTC)reply
Delete The article lacks quality secondary sources.
John Pack Lambert (
talk) 18:06, 18 June 2016 (UTC)reply
Delete per
WP:BIO. Could have been speedied G11, but this nomination focuses on notability. It's referenced only by an article written by the subject, and I can't find significant coverage online in
WP:RS. I tried to add a reference I found on
YourStory, but that URL has been blacklisted, which makes me doubt its suitability as a
WP:RS.
OnionRing (
talk) 05:56, 19 June 2016 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.