The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kharkiv07 (
T) 00:17, 10 August 2015 (UTC)reply
Redirect to
La Cage aux Folles (film)#Adam and Yves (changed from Delete) it was proposed and was dropped, end of story, no lasting impact, something of the "one-event" variety, relegated to be a footnote of History. Refs are short mentions in gossip columns, and two off-line sources with probably the same short trivial mentions.
Kraxler (
talk) 18:01, 16 August 2015 (UTC)reply
Amended, per Bearcat, below.
Kraxler (
talk) 14:28, 17 August 2015 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —
JJMC89 (
T·E·C) 01:45, 17 August 2015 (UTC)reply
As an early incident in the evolving representation of
LGBT coverage in media, this is certainly notable enough to merit a line or two somewhere in Wikipedia — but as a show that never actually made it to air, it doesn't really need its own standalone article. Redirect to
La Cage aux Folles (film), since that's the film it was based on and there's already a brief mention of it in there.
Bearcat (
talk) 01:56, 17 August 2015 (UTC)reply
You are right, thanks for pointing to the target of the proposed redirect.
Kraxler (
talk) 14:28, 17 August 2015 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.