The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Comment - Note that the search also brings up a wrestling organization also called "anarchy zone wrestling" or somesuch, which might explain why that search gets more hits. --
Jackhorkheimer07:17, 11 December 2006 (UTC)reply
It would be more constructive, Curse of Fenric, to address why there are no sources in the article. Even if the nominator were under investigation for high treason, that wouldn't make
Wikipedia:Verifiability any less policy. Is there any coverage of this topic published in independent sources that we can use to verify the contents of the article? Can you provide links or other references to such sources? -
GTBacchus(
talk)10:23, 11 December 2006 (UTC)reply
Yeah, maybe. Everytime you edit an article here, it says at the bottom of the page, "Encyclopedic content must be
verifiable." If you follow the link, you read that, "Editors adding new material should cite a reliable source, or it may be challenged or removed by any editor." So what's wrong with nominating unverifiable content for deletion? If Wikipedia is being used to host original research, then deleting it is good. -
GTBacchus(
talk)20:37, 11 December 2006 (UTC)reply
Delete. I think it is possible to verify this information; for starters, this
page lists specific dates/locations of AZW events and the
`olelo programming table lists it. But I can find no notable mentions in independent sources outside the limited field of indy wrestling, aside from local event listings like
this. Coupled with the apparent size of these events (~100 people attending), it doesn't appear to meet notability criteria. -
SpuriousQ10:55, 11 December 2006 (UTC)reply
Weak Delete. While I strongly dispute the premise of a few editors that "unverifiable" is a synonym for "unverified" (surely, with but a cursory effort, we're verifying some of the facts) even by the standards of local indy wrestling feds this one is under the radar, if they've never broken over 150 fans for a show. They must have lost their shirts paying an appearance fee to A.J. Styles.
Ravenswing21:24, 11 December 2006 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.