The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. -- Scott Burley ( talk) 07:05, 26 April 2019 (UTC) reply

Accrediting Commission International (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Insufficient coverage in reliable sources to establish notability. It gets a few paragraphs in articles about people with degrees from associated institutions, but with just a single dedicated piece in QuackWatch, seeems to fall short. BiologicalMe ( talk) 19:01, 4 April 2019 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU ^(T) 20:34, 4 April 2019 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU ^(T) 20:34, 4 April 2019 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Arkansas-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU ^(T) 20:35, 4 April 2019 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU ^(T) 20:35, 4 April 2019 (UTC) reply

• Keep. The sourcing looks fine to me. The subject of the article appears to be notable precisely because it is not accredited. Mccapra ( talk) 00:22, 12 April 2019 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.