The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. ♠
PMC♠
(talk) 16:51, 16 February 2018 (UTC)reply
The organisation has very little coverage in independent sources, with that that exists being incidental. Does not meet
WP:ORGDEPTH.
Kb.au (
talk) 05:20, 25 January 2018 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
!dave 12:29, 1 February 2018 (UTC)reply
Delete -- does not meet
WP:NORG & significant RS coverage not found. I don't see a reason to merge it into the suggested article; the content would
WP:UNDUE there.
K.e.coffman (
talk) 05:31, 7 February 2018 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 20:11, 8 February 2018 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.