The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Keep meets
WP:NCRIC. Ten days ago,
I reminded this editor about the
closing comments of a past RfC "As with the RfC on secondary school notability, this should not be an invitation to "flood AfD with indiscriminate or excessive nominations". This is one of approx. a dozen back-to-back nominations made today within a 30 minute window, suggesting no attempt at
WP:BEFORE was used pre-nomination. LugnutsFire Walk with Me13:54, 18 January 2021 (UTC)reply
Delete. Fails NCRIC since matches against touring sides are not be considered to be the "highest domestic or international level"; even allowing for a nominal NCRIC pass, by consensus that would only provide an extremely weak presumption of notability that is extremely unreliable for cricketers such as these (
recent NSPORT discussion here). This also fails all meaningful guidelines including GNG and SPORTCRIT. No sources beyond wide ranging databases (including scorecards that do not count as SIGCOV); no suitable list to merge into. wjematherplease leave a message...12:23, 22 January 2021 (UTC)reply
Delete or redirect to
List of East Pakistan first-class cricketers. Main concern against redirecting as a first option is the relatively common name may need to be used elsewhere. A technical pass of NCRIC but failure of GNG - the article sort of says it all when it tells us that it's unclear how come he ended up in Cuba in the 1960s.
Blue Square Thing (
talk)
12:27, 23 January 2021 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.