From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. 78.26 ( spin me / revolutions) 14:18, 10 October 2019 (UTC) reply

Abhijit Das (Bobby) (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

He isn't elected as MP or MLA. Losing candidates are district level politician aren't notable. S. M. Nazmus Shakib ( talk) 09:29, 3 October 2019 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. S. M. Nazmus Shakib ( talk) 09:47, 3 October 2019 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. S. M. Nazmus Shakib ( talk) 09:47, 3 October 2019 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. S. M. Nazmus Shakib ( talk) 09:47, 3 October 2019 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 22:44, 3 October 2019 (UTC) reply
  • Delete fails WP:NPOL. Non notable politician who lost an election. So far only minor election related coverage in sources. No notable public office held. -- DBig Xray 06:06, 6 October 2019 (UTC) reply
  • Delete. As always, people do not get Wikipedia articles just for being candidates in elections they did not win — a person has to hold a notable office, not just run for one, to be notable as a politician. But this makes no credible claim that he had preexisting notability for other reasons that would have gotten him an article independent of the candidacy itself, and is referenced entirely to raw tables of vote totals rather than any evidence of reliable source coverage about him. Bearcat ( talk) 16:46, 6 October 2019 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.