The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
no information shown and no proof of notability
Redsky89 (
talk) 08:01, 11 November 2012 (UTC)reply
Keep. I don't understand what information is not shown, its just a normal biographical stub. As for notability,
[1] says he was the Deputy Minister of Culture.
[2] says he served in both the senate and the house. (Note that I'm using Google translate for translating these).
Legoktm (
talk) 08:06, 11 November 2012 (UTC)reply
Keep. The article provides useful basic biographical details. --
Ipigott (
talk) 08:11, 11 November 2012 (UTC)reply
Keep. Take another look at the article and you'll see how ridiculous this nomination is. --
Michig (
talk) 08:22, 11 November 2012 (UTC)reply
Keep "Secretary of State for Culture and Media and Minister of Education, Culture and Science", obvious keep. Article should be expanded though, but that's no reason for deletion.
Garion96(talk) 10:35, 11 November 2012 (UTC)reply
Keep Ministerial office clearly passes
WP:POLITICIAN criteria 1 and 2.
AllyD (
talk) 10:46, 11 November 2012 (UTC)reply
Keep, this article about a notable
deceased person. Though there are indeed better secondary sources out there than these
obituaries, these articles written after his
death indicate positions of notability
[3],
[4],
[5]. Cheers, — Cirt (
talk) 00:33, 12 November 2012 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.