The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jenks24 ( talk) 09:20, 14 June 2016 (UTC) reply

AVI Systems (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

references are local business journals, which are a merely a place to reprint press releases, and downright press releases. And a few directory listings. None of this is evidence for notability DGG ( talk ) 08:15, 6 June 2016 (UTC) reply

• Delete as I am actually familiar with this but my searches have found nothing better and there's simply nothing minimally better. SwisterTwister talk 16:28, 6 June 2016 (UTC) reply
• Delete I do not even see a credible claim of significance here and this article would never have passed AfC. There are many "audio visual" companies in the world and I do not see why this one is notable. Is it responsible for inventing multiple notable products? Was it involved in some notable events? In addition it fails WP:CORPDEPTH. All the references in the article are either passing mentions or local business journals whose independence and reliability I doubt. For notable company, I would expect some coverage in a mainstream national newspaper at least. Till such sources are found, delete this. Wikipedia is not a business listing. -- Lemongirl942 ( talk) 10:03, 11 June 2016 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Lemongirl942 ( talk) 10:04, 11 June 2016 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Lemongirl942 ( talk) 10:04, 11 June 2016 (UTC) reply

• Delete. No evidence of notability. No sign of significant coverage in reliable sources.  ^B E _C K ^Y _S A ^{Y L} E _S  07:26, 14 June 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.