From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure)Davey2010 Talk 00:03, 19 January 2016 (UTC) reply

A. I. Adams (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:N. Jm ( talk |  contribs) 22:07, 12 January 2016 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. clpo13( talk) 17:34, 16 January 2016 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Washington-related deletion discussions. clpo13( talk) 17:34, 16 January 2016 (UTC) reply
  • The article definitely needs improvement for both sourcing and substance, but members of state legislatures are considered notable per WP:NPOL #1. Keep and flag for improvement. Bearcat ( talk) 19:40, 16 January 2016 (UTC) reply
  • Keep. Obviously passes WP:POLITICIAN. -- Necrothesp ( talk) 15:30, 18 January 2016 (UTC) reply
  • Strong keep: Undeniably passes WP:POLITICIAN as others have noted. Orthodox2014 ( talk) 16:25, 18 January 2016 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.