- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy delete. Per G5. (non-admin closure) Jovanmilic97 ( talk) 22:50, 25 February 2019 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- 4D chess ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
A dictdef of a neologism - I've seen 9D and 12D chess [1] for this as well. Created by a CU-blocked user. power~enwiki ( π, ν) 22:03, 18 February 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 23:19, 18 February 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. ― Matthew J. Long -Talk- ☖ 00:05, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. ― Matthew J. Long -Talk- ☖ 00:05, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Popular culture-related deletion discussions. ― Matthew J. Long -Talk- ☖ 00:05, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Washington, D.C.-related deletion discussions. ― Matthew J. Long -Talk- ☖ 00:05, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
- Delete, per WP:NEO. References all fail the use-mention distinction. Lowercaserho ( talk) 04:57, 20 February 2019 (UTC)
- Keep. No prejudice to a WP:G4, but this is notable. Plenty of coverage on the notion that Trump is playing 4D chess. [2] [3] It's one of my favorite 2016 election memes, but it's been taken seriously by the likes of Kanye and Kasparov. wumbolo ^^^ 22:29, 20 February 2019 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 12:11, 25 February 2019 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 12:11, 25 February 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.