The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. (non-admin closure) The Herald (Benison) ( talk) 14:53, 3 July 2024 (UTC) reply

204 (Tyneside Scottish) Battery Royal Artillery

204 (Tyneside Scottish) Battery Royal Artillery (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The subject of the article does not seem to be notable. The article has not been edited in 3 years and only contains two independent sources. PercyPigUK ( talk) 12:02, 26 June 2024 (UTC) reply

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Military and United Kingdom. PercyPigUK ( talk) 12:02, 26 June 2024 (UTC) reply
• Keep The article is capable of expansion: the articles relating to the other batteries of this regiment are substantial and this battery has quite a history as well. I will expand it a bit. Dormskirk ( talk) 12:28, 26 June 2024 (UTC) reply

I have expanded the article and added a lot more sources: hopefully the proposal can now be withdrawn. Dormskirk ( talk) 17:28, 27 June 2024 (UTC) reply

• Keep per Dormskirk. -- Necrothesp ( talk) 12:56, 26 June 2024 (UTC) reply
• Comment Rickfive you are our expert here, your thoughts would be welcome. Buckshot06 (talk) 19:00, 26 June 2024 (UTC) reply
• Keep after Dormskirk's work expanding the article. Buckshot06 (talk) 06:05, 29 June 2024 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.