The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Although this article is well sourced and there was some international coverage of the events described, I am not sure that the coverage is sustained enough or the events significant enough to make the topic notable.
Mccapra (
talk)
07:32, 31 December 2023 (UTC)reply
Comment -- On current showing, I'd have to lean toward deletion based on
WP:NEVENT and
WP:NCRIME. All of the sources currently cited are
WP:PRIMARYNEWS. To by valid for mainspace, there need to be secondary sources that analyse the event in
WP:DEPTH or show lasting
WP:EFFECTS. It also appears that the coverage is specific to the timeframe of the original incident, which would fail
WP:PERSISTENCE. I am not ready to !vote until I see if anyone can resolve those issues with sources that are not accessible to me due to language barriers. Cheers,
Last1in (
talk)
13:03, 2 January 2024 (UTC)reply
Selective merge to
Algeria–Morocco relations. The sourcing appears to be routine news coverage of the event and its aftermath, so it's not notable in its own right, but there is relevant information for the target article. I wonder if
Mccapra or
Last1in would be willing to consider this as an alternative to deletion.
Thebiguglyalien (
talk)
20:08, 12 January 2024 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Final relist, leaning towards a merge. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
NotAGenious (
talk)
08:55, 21 January 2024 (UTC)reply
Merge if secondary sourcing can be found to support balanced addition to the target page.
Merge with
Algeria–Morocco relations a properly sourced and neutral version per above. Not every incident needs or has the WP:SIGCOV from WP:IS WP:RS sources to support a stand alone article. There is a good target for the merge, it will be improved, and the content/history will be accessible. //
Timothy ::
talk15:28, 28 January 2024 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.