The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete.
MelanieN (
talk) 00:50, 1 March 2017 (UTC)reply
WP:NOTNEWS. This story doesn't appear particularly notable, as it was two out-of-service trains that collided at low speed resulting in non-life-threatening injuries. Might be worth a blurb in the
SEPTA article at best, but even that is questionable.
Ahecht (
TALK PAGE) 15:57, 21 February 2017 (UTC)reply
Delete per nom. The sole source does say the operator was in critical condition, but even a death wouldn't raise this accident to notability.
Clarityfiend (
talk) 02:39, 22 February 2017 (UTC)reply
Delete per nomination. Trivial incident which will receive
WP:ROUTINE coverage and nothing more.
Mackensen(talk) 11:45, 22 February 2017 (UTC)reply
Delete concur with nom. The news article reference on which this article is based is only eight sentences total. Trivial incident.
MB 05:01, 24 February 2017 (UTC)reply
Delete - can be adequately covered by an entry in the relevant list of rail accidents.
Mjroots (
talk) 22:01, 24 February 2017 (UTC)reply
Delete. No fatalities, the one ref is just a few sentences and I suspect there won't be a lot of in-depth refs coming along, so doesn't meet
WP:GNG and probably can't.
Herostratus (
talk) 14:35, 26 February 2017 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.