- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Withdrawn. (non-admin closure) XabqEfdg ( talk) 06:08, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- 2004 Auburn Tigers football team ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Does not seem to be independently notable. Suggest merging with Auburn tigers football. XabqEfdg ( talk) 03:56, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of American football-related deletion discussions. XabqEfdg ( talk) 03:56, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
- Keep: Very clear WP:SIGCOV which allows this article to meet GNG. The team went 13-0, they were undefeated in the highest level of college football and were ranked top 10 in the AP polls for over 10 weeks. Hey man im josh ( talk) 04:12, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
- Keep It does need better sourcing, but this is so clearly a keep that the AfD is either mistaken or vexatious.
SportingFlyer
T·
C
04:44, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
- Not trying to be vexatious, so sorry if it came off that way. I just couldn't find sources describing this particular year of the team in detail (as opposed to describing it at the time). I do not know whether there are particular criteria for this sort of topic though, so if I have missed something I apologize and will withdraw the AfD.
XabqEfdg (
talk)
04:49, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
- Simply clicking on the Sugar Bowl article would bring up multiple sources which cover the team's season. SportingFlyer T· C 05:54, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
- Not trying to be vexatious, so sorry if it came off that way. I just couldn't find sources describing this particular year of the team in detail (as opposed to describing it at the time). I do not know whether there are particular criteria for this sort of topic though, so if I have missed something I apologize and will withdraw the AfD.
XabqEfdg (
talk)
04:49, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
- SNOW Keep, as others have noted the team was a ranked FBS team and clearly meets the WP:GNG. Esolo5002 ( talk) 05:01, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.