- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy keep. Withdrawn by nominator. (non-admin closure) Vaticidal prophet 05:33, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- 1840s in sociology ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Article has been unsourced since Jan 2007. Notability of topic is in question. Coin945 ( talk) 05:44, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:34, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
- Speedy keep, the nominator does not propose a valid WP:DEL-REASON. The nominator does not say which notability guideline this article fails to meet. SailingInABathTub ( talk) 10:28, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
- Keep, valid article. Geschichte ( talk) 10:47, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
- Keep Timeline articles are perfectly fine (and notability for the list itself isn't needed if its contents are notable), and even though it's uncited a quick spot-check against the articles themselves shows everything is in the correct year. Uses x ( talk • contribs) 12:46, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
- Keep I agree with Uses x - this type of article as well as the lists are notable based on the amount and quality of the content presented. Less Unless ( talk) 21:36, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
- Withdraw nomination per comments above. The article's notability is vicariously granted from the notability of the individual items in the timeline.-- Coin945 ( talk) 01:31, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.