The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Comment I'm just reflecting the consensus I noticed earlier this year
here regarding
another user redirecting asteroids <= 2000, which were eventually unredirected. As long as the relevant projects are notified, I don't care.
It might be more appropriate for you to do the notification, however, since the number of users watching these pages is probably low. I'm glad
65.94.43.89 happened on these.
AFAIR, the idea was that for asteroids <2000 that each be evaluated independently and individually, and not end up in bundle nominations or bot-assisted-redirection or mass redirects (such as AWB) --
65.94.43.89 (
talk)
05:59, 3 April 2015 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.