From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This candidate has withdrawn from the race; please do not vote. This page is kept primarily for historical reasons. Thank you!
I myself would like to lend a helping hand to the endevours of the arbcom. Some of my positions? I hate trolls, yet at the same time I believe in criminal rights. I strongly believe in such organizations as
WP:AMA . As can be seen from my work at
the medcom , I often take out time of my own to reorganize stuff and make sure everyone's doing what they should be. I'd check the RfAr page often, voting on every case I could manage. I see a lot of cases only get the attention of maybe four members. Do we want four people deciding things that can potentially affect the whole project? The more the merrier, much like we should never close
AfD 's where only two people voted, and RfA's with 4 supports and no other votes. I had told a good friend of mine here I wasn't going to run for arbcom, but after my friends pushed me, I gained interest. I'd like to lend a helping hand.
R
e
dwolf24 (
talk )
02:43, 5 October 2005 (UTC)
reply
Perhaps its worth noting that my proudest contribution is the reactivation of the medcom. Its also worth noting that I pulled out of the race after the events
here thinking I didn't have a shot. But friends and otherwise very kind people have nagged me into reentering the race. Direct questions below, or at my
talk page .
R
e
dwolf24 (
talk )
19:37, 8 October 2005 (UTC)
reply
Questions
Sceptr
e (
Talk )
00:01, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
reply
--
a.n.o.n.y.m
t
00:06, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
reply
Support --
Doc
ask?
00:06, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
reply
--
BorgQueen
00:07, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
reply
Guettarda
00:09, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
reply
The Land
00:18, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
reply
Voice of All
T |
@ |
ESP
00:18, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
reply
–
ugen64
00:19, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
reply
--
Ancheta Wis
00:20, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
reply
—
Kirill Lok
s
hin
00:25, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
reply
Support --
PRueda29 /
Ptalk29 /
Pcontribs29
00:29, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
reply
--
Sean |
Bla
ck
00:31, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
reply
Support . --
GraemeL
(talk)
00:40, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
reply
Support .
KHM03
01:00, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
reply
Support .
User:Zoe |
(talk)
01:02, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
reply
Support .
EWS23 |
(Leave me a message!)
01:08, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
reply
Support .--
Bookandcoffee
01:17, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
reply
Support .
uriah923 (
talk )
18:38, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
reply
Support . A proven history of Arb- and Med-ing.
Batmanand
01:21, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
reply
JYolkowski //
talk
01:23, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
reply
Support .
cookiecaper (
talk /
contribs )
01:33, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
reply
-- (
drini's page
☎ )
02:00, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
reply
Tony Sidaway |
Talk
02:05, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
reply
karmafist 02:17, 9 January 2006 (UTC) per his work at
Esperanza .
karmafist
02:17, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
reply
Support . --
Dl yo ns 493
Ta lk
02:24, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
reply
Support
Tony the Marine
02:42, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
reply
King of All the Franks
03:05, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
reply
Support
Fred Bauder
03:12, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
reply
brenneman
(t)
(c)
03:13, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
reply
Support .--
ragesoss
03:45, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
reply
Support . You back yet? -
Mys
e
kurity
03:54, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
reply
Support -
Greg Asche
(talk)
04:02, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
reply
Support , a lot of good work.
Crotalus horridus (
TALK •
CONTRIBS )
04:06, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
reply
Bobet
04:37, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
reply
uh-huh
Grutness ...
wha?
04:52, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
reply
Support . --
maru
(talk)
Contribs
05:00, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
reply
Support . -
A Man In Bl♟ck (
conspire |
past ops )
05:23, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
reply
Support . Getting to be about time I supported him on something :-).
Ëvilphoenix
Burn!
05:25, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
reply
Strong support – Has my full respect and support. –
Clockwork
Soul
05:35, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
reply
Support
SoLando (
Talk )
05:54, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
reply
Strong support, one of the nicest and most dedicated users I've met. -
Pureblade |
Θ 05:57, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
Support I think (good) mediation is helpful in achieving neutral articles. It is always easier to paint unpopular views as Trolls.
Benjamin Gatti
06:04, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
reply
Support —
Locke Cole •
t •
c
06:05, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
reply
Support
WAvegetarian
(talk)
(email)
(contribs)
06:11, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
reply
Support .
android
79
06:17, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
reply
Strong Support I have much respect for this user
Brian |
(Talk)
06:49, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
reply
Support . --
Angr (
tɔk )
07:05, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
reply
Support , user is youthful and exuberant, but his heart is in the right place. I am confident he can be reasoned with.
Sam Spade
07:07, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
reply
Support , good work on MedCom. —
Catherine \
talk
07:16, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
reply
Support . Dedicated, patient and kind, while not giving in.
Elle vécut heureusement toujours dorénavant (
Be eudaimonic! )
07:28, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
reply
Support .
utcursch |
talk
07:56, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
reply
Support . Still a bit concerned over losing a good mediator, but that is not a very good reason to oppose.
Sjakkalle
(Check!)
08:49, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
reply
Support I like what he did for the medcom.
Ban
e
s
09:54, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
reply
Support .
MJ (
☎ |
@ |
C )
09:58, 9 January 2006 (UTC) .
reply
Support --
Leo44 (
talk )
09:59, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
reply
Support . Only concern is whether he has the 100% committment necessary as he just came off of a long Wikibreak. #--
Woohookitty
(cat scratches)
11:11, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
reply
support :
Ombudsman
11:18, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
reply
support : diligent admin and a genuinely nice guy
Jbetak
11:23, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
reply
Support --
Nick Boalch
?!?
11:31, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
reply
Support .
Wizzy …
☎
12:26, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
reply
Support --
Terence Ong
Talk
12:29, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
reply
Yup →
Fir
e
Fox
12:42, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
reply
—
Nightstallion
(?)
12:45, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
reply
Strong support --
Cel
e
stianpower
háblame
13:23, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
reply
Support Good work with mediation.
Andrew Lenahan - St ar bli nd
13:27, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
reply
Support well respected user, full support.
mdmanser
13:57, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
reply
Support endangered animals.
Tom
e
r
talk
14:14, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
reply
Support , sensible user. But the oppose-voters have a point in that he may be more suited for mediation.
R
adiant
_>|<
14:15, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
reply
Strong support .
the wub
"?!"
RFR - a good idea?
15:48, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
reply
Support
Gryffindor
16:38, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
reply
Support
dab
(ᛏ )
17:23, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
reply
Support
Dick Clark
17:33, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
reply
Harrumph! --
MicahMN |
μ
17:49, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
reply
Support
Wikimol
18:54, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
reply
Support --
Ixfd64
19:29, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
reply
Haukur
21:56, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
reply
Support A realistic statement and a history of advocacy and kindness; a good balancing influence on the Arbcom. ➨
❝
R
E
DVERS
❞
22:11, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
reply
Support
Robdurbar
22:44, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
reply
Support Only concern is burnout, otherwise editer deserves support.
Smmurphy (
Talk )
23:28, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
reply
Support . —
Quarl (
talk )
2006-01-10 00:02
Z
Support as much because I want some teenagers in leadership positions than anything else. ~~
N (
t /
c )
00:58, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
reply
Raven4x4x
01:09, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
reply
Support
Maltmomma
(chat)
01:45, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
reply
Support
AnnH
(talk)
01:54, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
reply
Support
DTC
02:04, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
reply
Support --
Rayc
02:13, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
reply
Support
Andrew_pmk |
Talk
02:23, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
reply
Support .
≈ jossi ≈
t •
@
02:24, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
reply
Support . I share concerns about future burnout, but throwing himself into the gaping maw of arbitration is a noble sacrifice.
TenOfAllTrades (
talk )
02:51, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
reply
Support and agree with TenOfAllTrades. --
Idont Havaname (
Talk )
04:20, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
reply
Support , good editor --
Alynna
04:46, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
reply
Support : Gives helpful answers —
Sebastian
(talk)
05:36, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
reply
Support
Willmcw /
user:Will Beback /
10:02, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
reply
Support . A veteran. Definitely an experienced WPian.
__earth
12:36, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
reply
Support Yeah, I think you'll make sound decisions.--
MONGO
13:00, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
reply
Support , with some reservations due to the incidents referred to in the opposition table. I strongly approve of his diligence & his anti-exclusionist stance on Arbcom. —
It's-is-not-a-genitive
13:06, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
reply
Support a good editor with a personality suited for arbitration. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Reflex Reaction (
talk •
contribs )
Support .
Ral315
(talk)
19:52, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
reply
Support .
Prodego
talk
20:55, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
reply
Support ditto Sam Spade in #48
Donama
02:05, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
reply
Earliest edit October 17; most likely does not have suffrage.
Flcelloguy (
A note? )
02:14, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
reply
Support . --
Carnildo
06:41, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
reply
Michael Snow
00:05, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
reply
Oppose , questions. See my
voting rationale .
Talrias (
t |
e |
c )
00:08, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
reply
Zach
(Smack Back)
Fair use policy
00:11, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
reply
Weak oppose. Would rather see focus on MedCom.
Ambi
00:12, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
reply
Oppose inexperience.
David |
explanation |
Talk
00:15, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
reply
Cryptic
(talk)
00:22, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
reply
–
Quadell (
talk ) (
bounties )
00:30, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
reply
Another sad oppose, would burnout easily --
Jaranda
wat's sup
00:48, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
reply
Weak oppose , questions.
Carbonite |
Talk
01:00, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
reply
Oppose --
nixie
01:25, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
reply
TacoDeposit
01:25, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
reply
Oppose . -- Миборовский
U |
T |
C |
M |
E |
Chugoku Banzai !
01:27, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
reply
Oppose --
Angelo
01:46, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
reply
Oppose --
Jeffrey O. Gustafson -
Shazaam! -
<*>
01:59, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
reply
Oppose —
Bunchofgrapes (
talk )
02:27, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
reply
Oppose Good editor, but so many tasks already.
Xoloz
02:41, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
reply
Oppose . Too keen.
Grace Note
02:45, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
reply
Oppose (for now) , due to unanswered questions. After answering them, drop me a line and I'll reconsider, okay? Thanks.
Matt Yeager
04:19, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
reply
Oppose This user blanks other users' pages and then denies any wrongdoing.
freestylefrappe
04:36, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
reply
Oppose - inexperience and insubstantial answers. Good editor though. ←
Hob
04:42, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
reply
—
Dan |
talk
04:44, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
reply
Oppose --
Crunch
05:38, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
reply
Weak oppose --
cj |
talk
06:21, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
reply
Oppose . --
Kefalonia
09:48, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
reply
Oppose same reason as Jaranda and Xoloz really... too likely to burnout from the stress.
ALKIVAR
™
13:23, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
reply
oppose per above.
Gator
(talk)
14:03, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
reply
Oppose . Same as Jaranda, Xoloz and Alkivar above.--May the Force be with you!
Shreshth91
($ |-| r 3 $ |-| t |-|)
14:04, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
reply
Oppose great user, but unfit for ArbCom.
Grue
14:07, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
reply
Oppose - too juvenile (and not because of his age).
Proto
t
c
15:32, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
reply
Oppose - would prefer to see focus on medcom.
Phil Sandifer
16:37, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
reply
Oppose --
kingboyk
18:08, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
reply
—
Charles P.
(Mirv)
18:11, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
reply
Oppose —
Saravask
19:22, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
reply
Oppose - needs experience (and stamina)
Awolf002
20:56, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
reply
Splash
talk
23:13, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
reply
Creo que no . I used to be that cocky, too.
Wally
00:21, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
reply
Rob Church
Talk
01:16, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
reply
Reluctantly, in that the work on medcom is perhaps more valuable
older ≠
wiser
02:51, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
reply
Oppose Age, lack of life experience. Great editor and MedCom member however and nice guy.
EdwinHJ |
Talk
05:36, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
reply
Oppose .
silsor
05:45, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
reply
Oppose . Seems to think that Wikipedia should include only facts that people don't find offensive, while it omits facts that some people might find offensive. How can anybody with such a perspective have a claim to such a high position?
Corax
06:01, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
reply
Oppose . "hate"? "criminal"? them's fightin words. find a common ground, and help sow unity. not derision.
Avriette
06:15, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
reply
Oppose
Dalf |
Talk
09:51, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
reply
E Pluribus Anthony |
talk |
12:52, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
reply
Oppose . Very good at organising MedCom, but I've never seen him in action on any mediation, and it seems a little like it was just an addition to his WikiResume. A also worry a little about his age, sorry. —
Asbestos |
Talk
(RFC)
16:42, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
reply
Oppose . "criminal rights"?! yikes, are Wikipedia editors criminals now?
HGB
19:10, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
reply
Oppose , for reasons already expressed by others above. This was a tough decision as he is doing a great job at MedCom.
Rje
19:24, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
reply
Oppose
Septentrionalis
19:34, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
reply
Very Strong Oppose . Candidate thinks "I believe in criminal rights" is relevent to arbitration. Arbitration is not a judicial or a penal system.
Fifelfoo
22:27, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
reply
Oppose per above I like Redwolf24. But the distinction between a judicial system and Wikipedia arbitration is an important one for an arbitrator to understand, e.g., trolls could argue that they are allowed to waste more of our time because they weren't afforded "due process."
172
23:11, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
reply
Oppose (Note: Vote only reflects suitability of candidate to the role, and does not reflect overall contributions or personally.) -
Mailer Diablo
01:52, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
reply